Independent pickleball guide — not affiliated with the La Crosse Area Pickleball Club or the domain's previous owner.
La Crosse Pickleball

Reference · Court

Pickleball court lighting for park planners

The light levels published for recreational, club and professional courts, how pole height and placement are handled, the glare, spill-light and curfew limits written into local codes, and what cities report after switching to LED.

USA Pickleball's lighting page gives a goal rather than a number: "the highest level of uniform, glare-free illumination the budget allows." The numbers planners work with come from three places: the court construction manual released by the American Sports Builders Association (ASBA) and USA Pickleball, the Illuminating Engineering Society's sports lighting practice (IES RP-6; the 2015 edition, RP-6-15, is the one Andover, Conn., cites), and local zoning codes, which limit what leaves the court rather than what lands on it.

Published light levels by category

The 182-page ASBA/USA Pickleball manual has a lighting chapter but is not free to read. Its table is reproduced in a tennis-to-pickleball conversion guide from LSI, one of USA Pickleball's two lighting partners (the other is Musco), with the note "as seen in ASBA construction and maintenance manual." A brochure USA Pickleball hosts gives the same three averages.

Measure (maintained, in the primary playing area)Category I, professionalCategory II, clubCategory III, recreational
Average horizontal75 fc (750 lux)50 fc (500 lux)30 fc (300 lux)
Minimum horizontal60 fc40 fc20 fc
Max/min ratio, horizontal1.72.02.0
Average vertical50 fc30 fc20 fc
Max/min ratio, vertical1.72.02.0

"Maintained" figures allow for light loss as a system ages; Moreno Valley's standard, for example, designs to 0.80 of rated lamp lumens. The max/min ratio is uniformity: the brightest point divided by the darkest. A design meets a category only if it meets every row for that category, the LSI guide says.

Other targets in public documents

DocumentWhat it asks for
McCracken County, KY, bid MC-2023-8 (Aug. 2023)Maintained average of 300 lux horizontal and 200 lux vertical in the primary playing area of the Heath Park pickleball/tennis courts; LED required. The bid writes "foot-candles of 300 lux," mixing units.
Andover, CT, lighting plan outlineTown targets the IES "Outdoor High School" level: average 20–30 fc, max/min 1.7:1. The proposed design: average 31.8 fc, minimum 26.2, maximum 37.1, on 30-ft poles.
Fremont, CA, Central Park Knoll (8 courts opened June 2024)Lighting in design to meet IES requirements for recreational play on outdoor courts; no number published.
Moreno Valley, CA, park lighting standards (undated)Tennis: 50 fc at the net and 30 fc at the baseline; no more than 3 to 1 brightest-to-darkest across a playing area.
DarkSky (IDA) sports criteria, 2018Only IES Class III and IV levels qualify for its award, and a design may exceed the class average by no more than 10%.

Where they disagree: McCracken County's 300/200 lux matches Category III's 30 fc horizontal and 20 fc vertical, and Andover's design clears Category III. Moreno Valley's older 3:1 uniformity allowance is looser than the 2.0 in the manual's recreational column.

Side view of a lit court and the limits that apply beyond it A side elevation. On the left a court with a net lies on the ground under a yellow cone of light from a shielded fixture on a pole at the court's edge. To the right are a fence, a dashed property line with a meter point a short height above grade, a house, and a check point farther out. A dimension line under the ground runs from the court edge to the far check point. A clock in the upper right marks the curfew. Six numbered markers match the list below the drawing. COURTNET FENCE PROPERTY LINE FROM COURT EDGE TO CHECK POINT CURFEW 1 2 3 4 5 6
  1. Playing area, Category III (recreational): 30 fc average and 20 fc minimum horizontal, max/min 2.0, 20 fc average vertical.
  2. Pole: capped at 25 ft for sports courts in Wilton's draft rule and 18 ft in Poway's code; Andover's plan uses 30-ft poles.
  3. Fully shielded fixture with a visor, aimed down at the court (Wilton draft, Midway, Poway).
  4. Property line: 0.20 fc at residential lines in Wilton's draft, measured 5 ft above grade; 0.5 fc above ambient in Poway.
  5. DarkSky check point 150 ft beyond the court edge: at most 0.20 fc and 1,000 candela.
  6. Lights off by 11 p.m. (DarkSky criteria, Wilton draft); 10 p.m. in Poway.
Drawn for this site from the LSI/ASBA category table, Wilton's draft Section 29-9.E.5, Poway Municipal Code 17.30.020, Midway's 2024 staff report, Andover's lighting plan outline and DarkSky's 2018 sports lighting criteria (see Sources). Not to scale.

Poles and fixture placement

  • Two layouts. USA Pickleball's partner chart sorts systems by placement, "Outside of the Courts" or "Next to the Courts," and by pole height, "Over 40ft" or "Under 30ft."
  • Height caps. Wilton's draft caps sports-court poles at 25 ft (fields: 80 ft), allowing more only if it improves light control or safety, and keeps poles 50 ft from residential-district lines in the hearing text. Poway allows at most eight lights no higher than 18 ft on private courts, with the light source cut off from view above 5 ft at 10 ft from the court edge.
  • Taller can mean tighter control. Moreno Valley's standards tell designers to maximize pole height to meet its environmental limits, and Wilton's exception for taller poles rests on the same idea. Caps and "go taller" advice pull in opposite directions; the code that applies decides.
  • Converted tennis courts. Most lit tennis courts use 6 or 8 poles with 1 or 2 HID fixtures each, the LSI guide says, and conversions usually reuse the poles. McCracken County's bid moved six 50-ft poles from another site to Heath Park.

Glare, spill-light and curfew limits in codes

JurisdictionSpill and glareHours, color, fixtures
Wilton, CT (hearing draft; draft resolution of Nov. 17, 2025)0.20 fc at residential and 0.30 fc at other property lines, 5 ft above grade; no more than 1,000 candela at 150 ft; fully shielded, with visors or louversOff by 11 p.m., 30-minute override to finish play; 4,200 K maximum; LED or equivalent of at least 70 lumens per watt
Poway, CA (PMC 17.30.020, private courts)0.5 fc above ambient at the property line; shields, visors or louvers7 a.m.–10 p.m.; 1,000-W high-pressure sodium or narrow-spectrum amber LED of 3,000 K or less; photocells
Moreno Valley, CA (park standards)0.25 fc at 5 ft from the property line, up to 0.5 fc where needed; 12,000 candlepower per fixture maximumWritten around 1,000- and 1,500-W metal halide
Andover, CT (zoning cited in plan)0.2 lumens per sq ft at property lines; shielded LEDOff no later than 11 p.m.; 4,000 K in the plan
Midway, UT (staff report, Apr. 16, 2024)Full cut-off fixtures; no light across the property lineStaff proposed banning lights on private courts; light-trespass complaints had outnumbered noise complaints
DarkSky criteria (2018)At most 0.20 fc and 1,000 candela at 150 ft beyond the court; at most 15% of lumens outside the court plus 33 ftOff by 11 p.m.; 5,700 K maximum; dimmable from 25% to 100%

Color temperature caps range from 3,000 K (Poway) to 5,700 K (DarkSky). Fruit Heights, Utah, planning commissioners called an 11 p.m. curfew for sport lighting "reasonable" in August 2025 while drafting their own rule.

LED versus older fixtures

  • Wake Forest, NC (April 2024): Flaherty Park's tennis-court lights went from 1,000-W metal halide to 450-W LED, 55% less power per fixture with more light output, for $178,511 from a 2022 bond. LEDs reach full brightness instantly; the metal halide took several minutes. Lights run 30 minutes before dusk to 10 p.m. on push-button timers, with remote on/off and dimming.
  • Minnetonka, MN (2016): park staff said "LED lighting provides improved spill control and more efficient energy use" for fields near homes.
  • Boston University (2014, indoor): replacing 127 metal halide fixtures in its track and tennis center was projected to save 770,000 kWh a year, 40% of the building's past use.
  • Annapolis, MD: the Truxtun Park pickleball court lights project lists $381,150 in total cost and $1,500 a year for maintenance and electricity.

For full court budgets, see what cities paid for courts.

Planning steps

  1. Pick the category the courts must meet: Category III (recreational, 30 fc average) or Category II (club competitions, 50 fc).
  2. Find the local code: property-line limit, measuring height, pole cap, curfew, color temperature and whether a permit or hearing is needed.
  3. Ask bidders for a point-by-point photometric plan showing horizontal and vertical averages, minimums and max/min ratios, plus spill at the property line.
  4. Fix the court and run-off layout first (sizes on the dimensions page) so pole positions and the photometric grid match what gets built.
  5. Specify controls: timers or push buttons, curfew shut-off, dimming.
  6. Talk to neighbors early. Light trespass drew more complaints than noise in Midway; see also pickleball noise.

Bid review checklist

  • Maintained (not initial) foot-candles stated for horizontal and vertical.
  • Minimum and max/min ratio meet the chosen category.
  • Units consistent: foot-candles or lux, not both in one line.
  • Spill light shown at the property line at the code's measuring height.
  • Fixtures fully shielded; visors or louvers where neighbors can see the source.
  • Pole heights and setbacks within the local cap.
  • Color temperature within any local limit.
  • Curfew shut-off and on-demand controls included.
  • Operating and maintenance cost stated, not just the install price.

Related: court surfaces, court space calculator and winter and indoor play.

Sources

  1. USA Pickleball — Pickleball court lighting (goal statement; partner selection chart)
  2. USA Pickleball — Pickleball Court Construction and Maintenance Manual (ASBA and USA Pickleball; 182 pages; lighting chapter)
  3. LSI — Pickleball conversion guide (category table footnoted to the ASBA manual; tennis pole counts)
  4. LSI — Pickleball lighting brochure hosted by USA Pickleball (75/50/30 fc categories)
  5. Buildings — IES publishes RP-6-15, Sports and Recreational Area Lighting (Sept. 15, 2015)
  6. International Dark-Sky Association — Criteria for Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting v1.0 (March 2018)
  7. Town of Andover, CT, Planning and Zoning Commission — Pickleball court lighting plan outline
  8. McCracken County, KY — Bid MC-2023-8, Heath Park court lighting (Aug. 8, 2023)
  9. City of Fremont, CA — Central Park Knoll pickleball court lighting project
  10. City of Moreno Valley, CA — Lighting Standards for Parks and Related Public Facilities
  11. Town of Wilton, CT — Proposed text amendment §29-9.E.5, Municipal Recreation Lighting (hearing draft)
  12. Town of Wilton, CT, Planning and Zoning Commission — Draft Resolution #25-421 REG (Nov. 17, 2025)
  13. City of Poway, CA — Municipal Code Chapter 17.30, lighted recreational courts
  14. Midway City, UT — City Council staff report on court lighting (Apr. 16, 2024)
  15. Fruit Heights City, UT — Planning Commission minutes (Aug. 26, 2025)
  16. Town of Wake Forest, NC — LED lighting upgrade completed at Flaherty Park Tennis Courts (Apr. 3, 2024)
  17. City of Minnetonka, MN — Park Board minutes (Sept. 7, 2016)
  18. Boston University — LED lighting upgrade at Track and Tennis Center (Jan. 23, 2014)
  19. City of Annapolis, MD — Pickleball Court Lights, Truxtun Park (Project 40046)

Sources checked October 2026. Rules, fees and schedules change — confirm with the venue or governing body.